↓ Skip to main content

Mineralogy and Petrology of Comet 81P/Wild 2 Nucleus Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
609 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mineralogy and Petrology of Comet 81P/Wild 2 Nucleus Samples
Published in
Science, December 2006
DOI 10.1126/science.1135842
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E Zolensky, Thomas J Zega, Hajime Yano, Sue Wirick, Andrew J Westphal, Mike K Weisberg, Iris Weber, Jack L Warren, Michael A Velbel, Akira Tsuchiyama, Peter Tsou, Alice Toppani, Naotaka Tomioka, Kazushige Tomeoka, Nick Teslich, Mitra Taheri, Jean Susini, Rhonda Stroud, Thomas Stephan, Frank J Stadermann, Christopher J Snead, Steven B Simon, Alexandre Simionovici, Thomas H See, François Robert, Frans J M Rietmeijer, William Rao, Murielle C Perronnet, Dimitri A Papanastassiou, Kyoko Okudaira, Kazumasa Ohsumi, Ichiro Ohnishi, Keiko Nakamura-Messenger, Tomoki Nakamura, Smail Mostefaoui, Takashi Mikouchi, Anders Meibom, Graciela Matrajt, Matthew A Marcus, Hugues Leroux, Laurence Lemelle, Loan Le, Antonio Lanzirotti, Falko Langenhorst, Alexander N Krot, Lindsay P Keller, Anton T Kearsley, David Joswiak, Damien Jacob, Hope Ishii, Ralph Harvey, Kenji Hagiya, Lawrence Grossman, Jeffrey N Grossman, Giles A Graham, Matthieu Gounelle, Philippe Gillet, Matthew J Genge, George Flynn, Tristan Ferroir, Stewart Fallon, Sirine Fakra, Denton S Ebel, Zu Rong Dai, Patrick Cordier, Benton Clark, Miaofang Chi, Anna L Butterworth, Donald E Brownlee, John C Bridges, Sean Brennan, Adrian Brearley, John P Bradley, Pierre Bleuet, Phil A Bland, Ron Bastien

Abstract

The bulk of the comet 81P/Wild 2 (hereafter Wild 2) samples returned to Earth by the Stardust spacecraft appear to be weakly constructed mixtures of nanometer-scale grains, with occasional much larger (over 1 micrometer) ferromagnesian silicates, Fe-Ni sulfides, Fe-Ni metal, and accessory phases. The very wide range of olivine and low-Ca pyroxene compositions in comet Wild 2 requires a wide range of formation conditions, probably reflecting very different formation locations in the protoplanetary disk. The restricted compositional ranges of Fe-Ni sulfides, the wide range for silicates, and the absence of hydrous phases indicate that comet Wild 2 experienced little or no aqueous alteration. Less abundant Wild 2 materials include a refractory particle, whose presence appears to require radial transport in the early protoplanetary disk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Professor 9 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 30%
Physics and Astronomy 43 27%
Chemistry 11 7%
Materials Science 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,135,635
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#34,843
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,417
of 172,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#129
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.