↓ Skip to main content

Assigning clinical meaning to somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing data in a prospective cancer precision medicine study

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assigning clinical meaning to somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing data in a prospective cancer precision medicine study
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/gim.2016.191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arezou A. Ghazani, Nelly M. Oliver, Joseph P. St. Pierre, Andrea Garofalo, Irene R. Rainville, Elaine Hiller, Daniel J. Treacy, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, Sam Wood, Elizabeth Bair, Michael Parello, Franklin Huang, Marios Giannakis, Frederick H. Wilson, Elizabeth H. Stover, Steven M. Corsello, Tom Nguyen, Huma Q. Rana, Alanna J. Church, Carol Lowenstein, Carrie Cibulskis, Ali Amin-Mansour, Jennifer Heng, Lauren Brais, Abigail Santos, Patrick Bauer, Amanda Waldron, Peter Lo, Megan Gorman, Christine A. Lydon, Marisa Welch, Philip McNamara, Stacey Gabriel, Lynette M. Sholl, Neal I. Lindeman, Judy E. Garber, Steven Joffe, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Stacy W. Gray, Pasi A. Jänne, Levi A. Garraway, Nikhil Wagle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 13 14%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Computer Science 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,891,058
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,245
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,423
of 429,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.