You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole G. Weiskopf, George Hripcsak, Sushmita Swaminathan, Chunhua Weng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Norway | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 407 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 19% |
| Researcher | 74 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 80 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 93 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 96 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,509,006
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#206
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,104
of 211,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.