↓ Skip to main content

Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11605-017-3364-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xudong Zhao, Aizhen Cai, Hongqing Xi, Lin Chen, Zheng Peng, Peiyu Li, Na Liu, Jianxin Cui, Hua Li

Abstract

Less invasive surgery is gaining popularity for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC), but there are no definitive guidelines for the use of less invasive surgery for the treatment of undifferentiated EGC. The aims of this meta-analysis were to identify potential predictive factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in undifferentiated EGC and to guide the personalized therapeutic modality for patients with undifferentiated EGC. An extensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant articles involving undifferentiated EGC and LNM. Eligible data were systematically reviewed through a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3. In total, 23 studies were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis found that the variables sex (female), age (greater than 60 years), tumor size (greater than 20 mm), depth of invasion (submucosal invasion), presence of lymphovascular involvement, presence of ulcer findings, histology type (non-signet ring carcinoma), and tumor location (not in the middle part of the stomach) were significantly associated with LNM. Eight variables were identified as predictive factors for LNM in undifferentiated EGC. The significance of these variables should be further confirmed during the process of LNM in undifferentiated EGC patients for future clinical application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#2,085
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,688
of 422,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.