↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the visual system in Friedreich ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the visual system in Friedreich ataxia
Published in
Journal of Neurology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-6978-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren A. Seyer, Kristin Galetta, James Wilson, Reiko Sakai, Susan Perlman, Katherine Mathews, George R. Wilmot, Christopher M. Gomez, Bernard Ravina, Theresa Zesiewicz, Khalaf O. Bushara, S. H. Subramony, Tetsuo Ashizawa, Martin B. Delatycki, Alicia Brocht, Laura J. Balcer, David R. Lynch

Abstract

To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) and contrast letter acuity to characterize vision loss in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). High- and low-contrast letter acuity and neurological measures were assessed in 507 patients with FRDA. In addition, OCT was performed on 63 FRDA patients to evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness. Both OCT and acuity measures were analyzed in relation to genetic severity, neurologic function, and other disease features. High- and low-contrast letter acuity was significantly predicted by age and GAA repeat length, and highly correlated with neurological outcomes. When tested by OCT, 52.7% of eyes (n = 110) had RNFL thickness values below the fifth percentile for age-matched controls. RNFL thickness was significantly lowest for those with worse scores on the Friedreich ataxia rating scale (FARS), worse performance measure composite Z2 scores, and lower scores for high- and low-contrast acuity. In linear regression analysis, GAA repeat length and age independently predicted RNFL thickness. In a subcohort of participants, 21% of eyes from adult subjects (n = 29 eyes) had macular thickness values below the first percentile for age-matched controls, suggesting that macular abnormalities can also be present in FRDA. Low-contrast acuity and RNFL thickness capture visual and neurologic function in FRDA, and reflect genetic severity and disease progression independently. This suggests that such measures are useful markers of neurologic progression in FRDA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,055
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,214
of 4,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,955
of 196,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#33
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.