↓ Skip to main content

Zur Kenntniss der Sinnesorgane der Schlangen

Overview of attention for article published in Archiv fr Mikroskopische Anatomie, December 1872
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 111)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Zur Kenntniss der Sinnesorgane der Schlangen
Published in
Archiv fr Mikroskopische Anatomie, December 1872
DOI 10.1007/bf02955847
Authors

F. Leydig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Materials Science 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,426,794
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archiv fr Mikroskopische Anatomie
#3
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archiv fr Mikroskopische Anatomie
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them