↓ Skip to main content

Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11914-017-0343-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robyn K. Fuchs, Mariana E. Kersh, Julio Carballido-Gamio, William R. Thompson, Joyce H. Keyak, Stuart J. Warden

Abstract

Physical activity improves proximal femoral bone health; however, it remains unclear whether changes translate into a reduction in fracture risk. To enhance any fracture-protective effects of physical activity, fracture prone regions within the proximal femur need to be targeted. The proximal femur is designed to withstand forces in the weight-bearing direction, but less so forces associated with falls in a sideways direction. Sideways falls heighten femoral neck fracture risk by loading the relatively weak superolateral region of femoral neck. Recent studies exploring regional adaptation of the femoral neck to physical activity have identified heterogeneous adaptation, with adaptation principally occurring within inferomedial weight-bearing regions and little to no adaptation occurring in the superolateral femoral neck. There is a need to develop novel physical activities that better target and strengthen the superolateral femoral neck within the proximal femur. Design of these activities may be guided by subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling and finite-element modeling approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 28 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,652,782
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#137
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,163
of 422,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.