↓ Skip to main content

A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy
Published in
European Radiology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1270-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lodewijk Cobben, Ingrid Groot, Lucas Kingma, Emile Coerkamp, Julien Puylaert, Johan Blickman

Abstract

To establish the value of breathhold magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Over a 14-month period, 138 patients clinically suspected of having appendicitis were evaluated prospectively with MRI and comprised the study group. Fast turbo spin-echo breathhold T1, T2 and T2 fat suppression sequences were used in coronal and axial planes. The imaging results were recorded separately and subsequently correlated with clinical, radiological and histopathological follow-up. The effect of imaging strategies in patients suspected of appendicitis on hospital resources was calculated. Sixty-two of the 138 patients had a histopathologically proven appendicitis. MRI determined appendicitis in 63 patients, with one examination being false positive. The resulting sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 99%, respectively. MRI showed an alternative diagnosis in 41 of the 75 remaining patients. In 22 of the remaining 34 patients, a normal appendix was depicted with MRI. In two patients, where MRI showed no appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis or normal appendix, an unnecessary appendectomy was performed. The overall effect of using MRI in patients suspected of appendicitis on the use of hospital resources could have been a net saving between 55,746 euros and 72,534 euros. MRI has a high accuracy in detecting and excluding appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis or showing the normal appendix, and can be a valuable and cost-effective tool in the workup of patients clinically suspected of having appendicitis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 16%