You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x689353 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Drinkwater, Nicky Stanley, Eszter Szilassy, Cath Larkins, Marianne Hester, Gene Feder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 53% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,066,867
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,381
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,121
of 428,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#30
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.