You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducibility of consecutive automated telemetric noctodiurnal IOP profiles as determined by an intraocular implant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjo-2022-323080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline J O N van den Bosch, Vincenzo Pennisi, Harsha Laxmana Rao, Kaweh Mansouri, Robert Weinreb, Hagen Thieme, Michael B Hoffmann, Lars Choritz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,444,243
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#601
of 6,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,803
of 237,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.