↓ Skip to main content

Privatization, Drought, and Fire Exclusion in the Tuul River Watershed, Mongolia

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Privatization, Drought, and Fire Exclusion in the Tuul River Watershed, Mongolia
Published in
Ecosystems, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9673-0
Authors

Thomas Saladyga, Amy Hessl, Baatarbileg Nachin, Neil Pederson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,519,976
of 24,592,508 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#973
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,205
of 198,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,592,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.