| Title |
Midterm results of arthroscopic treatment of scapholunate ligament lesions associated with intra‐articular distal radius fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, September 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001670050172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Peicha, F.‐J. Seibert, M. Fellinger, W. Grechenig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,116
of 2,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,515
of 35,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.