↓ Skip to main content

Variation in day‐case nasal surgery – why cannot we improve our day‐case rates?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in day‐case nasal surgery – why cannot we improve our day‐case rates?
Published in
Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, February 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01368.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Hopkins, J. Browne, R. Slack, P. Brown

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Malaysia 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Postgraduate 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences
#306
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,039
of 169,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.