↓ Skip to main content

Quality of end-of-life treatment for cancer patients in general wards and the palliative care unit at a regional cancer center in Japan: a retrospective chart review

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Quality of end-of-life treatment for cancer patients in general wards and the palliative care unit at a regional cancer center in Japan: a retrospective chart review
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00520-007-0332-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuki Sato, Mitsunori Miyashita, Tatsuya Morita, Makiko Sanjo, Yasuo Shima, Yosuke Uchitomi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Cyprus 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,881
of 4,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,445
of 72,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.