↓ Skip to main content

The impact of informing psychiatric patients about their medication: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
The impact of informing psychiatric patients about their medication: a systematic review
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11096-006-9054-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franciska A. M. Desplenter, Steven Simoens, Gert Laekeman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 6%
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 12%
Psychology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#645
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,482
of 175,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.