| Title |
A validation study of the WHO analgesic ladder: a two-step vs three-step strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-005-0807-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Maltoni, Emanuela Scarpi, Caterina Modonesi, Alessandro Passardi, Sebastiano Calpona, Adriana Turriziani, Raffaella Speranza, Davide Tassinari, Pierantonio Magnani, Denis Saccani, Luigi Montanari, Britt Roudnas, Dino Amadori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 26% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,881
of 4,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,929
of 59,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.