Title |
Analysis of reasons for osteonecrosis of the jaws
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00784-014-1205-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christian Walter, Keyvan Sagheb, Jennifer Bitzer, Roman Rahimi-Nedjat, Katherine Joyce Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 69% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#321
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,083
of 224,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.