| Title |
FDG-PET for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: systematic review and metaanalysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-008-0887-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Kwee, Robert M. Kwee, Abass Alavi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 28% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#981
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,398
of 83,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.