| Title |
Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, February 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00337585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Søndenaa, E. Andersen, I. Nesvik, J. A. Søreide |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 27% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#398
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,419
of 76,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them