| Title |
Definitive management of acute pilonidal abscess by loop diathermy excision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, May 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02156276 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baruch Shpitz, Zvi Kaufman, Alex Kantarovsky, Antonio Reina, Alex Dinbar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#2,064
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,554
of 15,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them