↓ Skip to main content

Failure to Demonstrate That Playing Violent Video Games Diminishes Prosocial Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
235 X users
facebook
34 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
14 Google+ users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure to Demonstrate That Playing Violent Video Games Diminishes Prosocial Behavior
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgan J. Tear, Mark Nielsen

Abstract

Past research has found that playing a classic prosocial video game resulted in heightened prosocial behavior when compared to a control group, whereas playing a classic violent video game had no effect. Given purported links between violent video games and poor social behavior, this result is surprising. Here our aim was to assess whether this finding may be due to the specific games used. That is, modern games are experienced differently from classic games (more immersion in virtual environments, more connection with characters, etc.) and it may be that playing violent video games impacts prosocial behavior only when contemporary versions are used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 172 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 24%
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 44%
Social Sciences 20 11%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#110,290
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,731
of 224,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#644
of 207,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#42
of 4,810 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,810 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.