↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 2,796)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00127-017-1341-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra C. Gronholm, Claire Henderson, Tanya Deb, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

There is a rich literature on the nature of mental health-related stigma and the processes by which it severely affects the life chances of people with mental health problems. However, applying this knowledge to deliver and evaluate interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma in a lasting way is a complex and long-term challenge. We conducted a narrative synthesis of systematic reviews published since 2012, and supplemented this with papers published subsequently as examples of more recent work. There is evidence for small to moderate positive impacts of both mass media campaigns and interventions for target groups in terms of stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, and intended behaviour in terms of desire for contact. However, the limited evidence from longer follow-up times suggests that it is not clear whether short-term contact interventions have a lasting impact. The risk that short-term interventions may only have a short-term impact suggests a need to study longer term interventions and to use interim process and outcome data to improve interventions along the way. There is scope for more thorough application of intergroup contact theory whenever contact is used and of evidence-based teaching and assessment methods when skills training is used for target groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 512 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 14%
Student > Bachelor 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 13%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 133 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 13%
Social Sciences 56 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 7%
Arts and Humanities 16 3%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 156 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 303. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#116,000
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#14
of 2,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,730
of 430,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.