↓ Skip to main content

Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Gastric Cancer, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer
Published in
Gastric Cancer, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10120-008-0492-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Michael Kwee, Thomas Christian Kwee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 65%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,734,949
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#70
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,129
of 93,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them