| Title |
Serial O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-005-0053-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriele Pöpperl, Claudia Götz, Walter Rachinger, Oliver Schnell, Franz J. Gildehaus, Joerg C. Tonn, Klaus Tatsch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#981
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,145
of 67,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.