| Title |
The aging of the 2000 and 2011 Hallmarks of Cancer reviews: A critique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12038-013-9335-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Sonnenschein, Ana M Soto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 389 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 24% |
| Researcher | 68 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 87 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,206,296
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#78
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,971
of 208,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them