↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin K: missed at peril—the case for extra supplementation to prevent deficiency in breastfed preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin K: missed at peril—the case for extra supplementation to prevent deficiency in breastfed preterm infants
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Clarke, Nicholas D Embleton, Mary Fewtrell, Dominic J Harrington, Anne M Kelly, Naomi Moris, Alexander Patto, Vennila Ponnusamy, Vimal Vasu, Martin J Shearer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,282,836
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#637
of 2,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,738
of 308,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.