↓ Skip to main content

The radiation‐damaged rectum: Resection with coloanal anastomosis using the endoanal technique

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The radiation‐damaged rectum: Resection with coloanal anastomosis using the endoanal technique
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01658138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley A. R. Cooke, Michael D. Wellsted

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,512
of 4,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,012
of 10,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them