↓ Skip to main content

The outcome of transanal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal fistulas is not improved by an additional labial fat flap transposition

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
The outcome of transanal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal fistulas is not improved by an additional labial fat flap transposition
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s101510200007
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. D. E. Zimmerman, M. P. Gosselink, J. W. Briel, W. R. Schouten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#669
of 1,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,479
of 239,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.