↓ Skip to main content

Non-operative management of a rectovaginal fistula complicating stapled haemorrhoidectomy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Non-operative management of a rectovaginal fistula complicating stapled haemorrhoidectomy
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00384-007-0416-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfredo Giordano, Marcello della Corte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#398
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,105
of 157,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.