↓ Skip to main content

Successful transvaginal repair of a rectovaginal fistula developing after double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection: Report of four cases

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery Today, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Successful transvaginal repair of a rectovaginal fistula developing after double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection: Report of four cases
Published in
Surgery Today, May 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02483037
Authors

Tohru Nakagoe, Terumitsu Sawai, Takashi Tuji, Atushi Nanashima, Hiroyuki Yamaguchi, Tohru Yasutake, Yoshihiro Ayabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 18%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 73%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#132
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,166
of 35,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.