↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical double‐bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Anatomical double‐bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00167-009-0868-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip B. Schöttle, Daniel Hensler, Andreas B. Imhoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 65%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,014
of 2,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,444
of 110,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.