| Title |
The Prognostic Effect of Clinical Staging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1245/aso.2005.02.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessio G. Morganti, M. Gabriella Brizi, Gabriella Macchia, Giuseppina Sallustio, Guido Costamagna, Sergio Alfieri, Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Vincenzo Valentini, Luigi Natale, Francesco Deodato, Massimiliano Mutignani, G. Battista Doglietto, Numa Cellini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,734,949
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,561
of 6,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,098
of 141,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.