| Title |
Instituting water research: the Water Resources Research Act (1964) and the Idaho Water Resources Research Institute
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water History, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12685-016-0190-x |
| Authors |
Adam M. Sowards, Brynn M. Lacabanne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,746,737
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from Water History
#26
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,381
of 429,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water History
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.