↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of ultralong-segment Barrett’s using focal and balloon-based radiofrequency ablation

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of ultralong-segment Barrett’s using focal and balloon-based radiofrequency ablation
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0639-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melina C. Vassiliou, Daniel von Renteln, Daniel C. Wiener, Stuart R. Gordon, Richard I. Rothstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 18 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,691
of 6,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,266
of 90,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.