↓ Skip to main content

S-3-Leitlinie LONTS

Overview of attention for article published in Der Schmerz, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
S-3-Leitlinie LONTS
Published in
Der Schmerz, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00482-009-0839-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Reinecke, H. Sorgatz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 15%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Other 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Psychology 3 23%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Der Schmerz
#75
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,807
of 104,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Schmerz
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.