| Title |
Morbus Gaucher, Mukopolysaccharidose Typ I (Scheie) und Morbus Fabry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00112-006-1324-5 |
| Authors |
H. Michels, E. Mengel, H. I. Huppertz, R. M. Schaefer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde
#62
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,576
of 66,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them