| Title |
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1296-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esko Ruokonen, Ilkka Parviainen, Stephan M. Jakob, Silvia Nunes, Maija Kaukonen, Stephen T. Shepherd, Toni Sarapohja, J. Raymond Bratty, Jukka Takala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 15% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 66% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,749,980
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,020
of 5,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,767
of 74,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.