| Title |
Competitive exclusion between insular Lacerta species (Sauria, Lacertidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, June 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00347990 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eviatar Nevo, George Gorman, Michael Soulé, Suh Yung Yang, Robert Clover, Vojislav Jovanović |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,785,541
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,197
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#638
of 3,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them