| Title |
Psychosocial stress and strategies for managing adversity: measuring population resilience in New South Wales, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Health Metrics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7954-8-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Taylor, Margo Barr, Garry Stevens, Donald Bryson-Taylor, Kingsley Agho, Jennifer Jacobs, Beverley Raphael |
| Abstract |
Populations around the world are facing an increasing number of adversities such as the global financial crisis, terrorism, conflict, and climate change. The aim of this paper was to investigate self-reported strategies and sources of support used to get through "tough times" in an Australian context and to identify patterns of response in the general population and differences in potentially vulnerable subgroups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,690,328
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#270
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,871
of 98,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.