↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for arthroscopic medial meniscectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for arthroscopic medial meniscectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12630-013-9992-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A. Hanson, Ryan E. Derby, David B. Auyong, Francis V. Salinas, Christina Delucca, Ryan Nagy, Zhuoxin Yu, April E. Slee

Abstract

The saphenous nerve block using a landmark-based approach has shown promise in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic medial meniscectomy. We hypothesized that performing an ultrasound-guided adductor canal saphenous block as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen would result in improved analgesia after arthroscopic medial meniscectomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,319
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,653
of 206,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.