↓ Skip to main content

Risk of stroke with different levels of leisure-time physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 8,870)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
158 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
121 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk of stroke with different levels of leisure-time physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 27 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 28 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2026.
All research outputs
#13,068
of 34,642,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#7
of 8,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284
of 383,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,642,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.