| Title |
The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-016-9454-x |
| Authors |
Alan K. Whitfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 426 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 13% |
| Researcher | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 118 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 112 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 137 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,210,566
of 24,189,858 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#55
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,062
of 318,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,189,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.