↓ Skip to main content

The determinants of performance in master swimmers: an analysis of master world records

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
The determinants of performance in master swimmers: an analysis of master world records
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2332-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Zamparo, G. Gatta, P. E. di Prampero

Abstract

Human performances in sports decline with age in all competitions/disciplines. Since the effects of age are often compounded by disuse, the study of master athletes provides the opportunity to investigate the effects of age per se on the metabolic/biomechanical determinants of performance. For all master age groups, swimming styles and distances, we calculated the metabolic power required to cover the distance (d) in the best performance time as: E' maxR ¼ C d=BTP ¼ C vmax; where C is the energy cost of swimming in young elite swimmers, vmax = d/BTP is the record speed over the distance d, and BTP was obtained form "cross-sectional data" (http://www.fina.org). To establish a record performance, E' maxR must be equal to the maximal available metabolic power (E'maxA). This was calculated assuming a decrease of 1% per year at 40 - 70 years, 2% at 70 - 80 years and 3% at 80 - 90 years (as indicated in the literature) and compared to the E' maxR values, whereas up to about 55 years of age E' maxR ¼ E' maxA; for older subjects E' maxA > E' maxR; the difference increasing linearly by about 0.30% (backstroke), 1.93% (butterfly), 0.92% (front crawl) and 0.37% (breaststroke) per year (average over the 50, 100 and 200 m distances). These data suggest that the energy cost of swimming increases with age. Hence, the decrease in performance in master swimmers is due to both decrease in the metabolic power available (E' maxA) and to an increase in C.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4,069
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,207
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#44
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.