↓ Skip to main content

Crosslinked collagen hydrogels as corneal implants: Effects of sterically bulky vs. non-bulky carbodiimides as crosslinkers

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Biomaterialia, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crosslinked collagen hydrogels as corneal implants: Effects of sterically bulky vs. non-bulky carbodiimides as crosslinkers
Published in
Acta Biomaterialia, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae-Il Ahn, Lucia Kuffova, Kimberley Merrett, Debbie Mitra, John V. Forrester, Fengfu Li, May Griffith

Abstract

We have previously shown that recombinant human collagen can be crosslinked with N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) to fabricate transparent hydrogels possessing the shape and dimensions of the human cornea. These corneal implants have been tested in a Phase I human clinical study. Although these hydrogels successfully promoted corneal tissue and nerve regeneration, the gelling kinetics were difficult to control during the manufacture of the implants. An alternative carbodiimide capable of producing hydrogels of similar characteristics as EDC in terms of strength and biocompatibility, but with a longer gelation time would be a desirable alternative. Here, we compared the crosslinking kinetics and properties of hydrogels crosslinked with a sterically bulky carbodiimide, N-Cyclohexyl-N'-(2-morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (CMC), with that of EDC. CMC crosslinking was possible at ambient temperature whereas the EDC reaction was too rapid to control and had to be carried out at low temperatures. The highest tensile strength obtained using optimized formulations were equivalent, although CMC crosslinked hydrogels were found to be stiffer. The collagenase resistance of CMC crosslinked hydrogels was superior to that of EDC crosslinked hydrogels while biocompatibility was similar. We are also able to substitute porcine collagen with recombinant human collagen and show that the in vivo performance of both resulting hydrogels as full-thickness corneal implants is comparable in a mouse model of an orthotopic corneal graft. In conclusion, CMC is a viable alternative to EDC as a crosslinker for collagen-based biomaterials for use as corneal implants, and potentially for use in other tissue engineering applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Materials Science 18 15%
Engineering 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Chemistry 11 9%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 28 23%