↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Dam Removal on Fish Community Interactions and Stability in the Eightmile River System, Connecticut, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Dam Removal on Fish Community Interactions and Stability in the Eightmile River System, Connecticut, USA
Published in
Environmental Management, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0794-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen M. Poulos, Barry Chernoff

Abstract

New multivariate time-series methods have the potential to provide important insights into the effects of ecosystem restoration activities. To this end, we examined the temporal effects of dam removal on fish community interactions using multivariate autoregressive models to understand changes in fish community structure in the Eightmile River System, Connecticut, USA. We sampled fish for 6 years during the growing season; 1 year prior to, 2 years during, and for 3 years after a small dam removal event. The multivariate autoregressive analysis revealed that the site above the dam was the most reactive and least resilient sample site, followed in order by the below-dam and nearby reference site. Even 3 years after the dam removal event, the stream was still in a recovery stage that had failed to approximate the community structure of the reference site. This suggests that the reorganization of fish communities following dam removals, with the goal of ecological restoration, may take decades to centuries for the restored sites to approximate the community structure of nearby undisturbed sites. Results from this study also highlight the utility of multivariate autoregressive modeling for examining temporal interactions among species in response to adaptive management activities both in aquatic systems and elsewhere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Engineering 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,348
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,243
of 417,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.