Title |
Heterogeneity of experts’ opinion regarding opportunities and challenges of tackling deforestation in the tropics: a Q methodology application
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11027-013-9529-0 |
Authors |
Maria Nijnik, Albert Nijnik, Emmy Bergsma, Robin Matthews |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 28% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 21 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#457
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,274
of 313,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.