↓ Skip to main content

Using ‘found’ data to augment a probability sample: Procedure and case study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Using ‘found’ data to augment a probability sample: Procedure and case study
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00555062
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. C. Mc Overton, T. C. Young, W. S. Overton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 14%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 45%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#555
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,113
of 21,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them