↓ Skip to main content

Special cases in Cornelia de Lange syndrome: The Spanish experience

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Special cases in Cornelia de Lange syndrome: The Spanish experience
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.c.31501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Pié, Beatriz Puisac, Maria Hernández-Marcos, Maria Esperanza Teresa-Rodrigo, Maria Gil-Rodríguez, Carolina Baquero-Montoya, Maria Ramos-Cáceres, Maria Bernal, Ariadna Ayerza-Casas, Inés Bueno, Paulino Gómez-Puertas, Feliciano J Ramos

Abstract

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is an autosomal dominant (NIPBL, SMC3, and RAD21) or X-linked (SMC1A and HDAC8) disorder, characterized by distinctive craniofacial appearance, growth retardation, intellectual disability, and limb anomalies. In 2005, the Spanish CdLS Reference Center was started and now we have more than 270 cases in our database. In this special issue, we describe some of the unique or atypical patients studied by our group, whose clinical features have contributed to the expansion of the CdLS classical phenotype, helping clinicians to diagnose it. We include the case of a male with unilateral tibial hypoplasia and peroneal agenesis who had a mutation in NIPBL; we also describe one patient with a mutation in NIPBL and somatic mosaicism identified by new generation sequencing techniques; we also include one patient with CdLS and Turner syndrome; and last, an interesting patient with a duplication of the SMC1A gene. Finally, we make a short review of the splicing mutations we have found in NIPBL regarding the new knowledge on the physiological variants of the gene. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics
#512
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,216
of 319,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.