↓ Skip to main content

Rate-activated strapping for improved retention of protective eyewear during impact

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Engineering, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Rate-activated strapping for improved retention of protective eyewear during impact
Published in
Sports Engineering, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12283-017-0226-1
Authors

Emily L. Ballantyne, Donald J. Little, Eric D. Wetzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 31%
Engineering 3 23%
Chemistry 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,017,111
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Sports Engineering
#247
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,837
of 426,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Engineering
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.