| Title |
Development of a molecular marker for specific detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-008-9372-4 |
| Authors |
Ying-Hong Lin, Jing-Yi Chang, En-Tzu Liu, Chih-Ping Chao, Jenn-Wen Huang, Pi-Fang Linda Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#226
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,477
of 102,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them